Understanding Pediatric Echocardiograms¶
Learning Objectives¶
Core Knowledge & Clinical Reasoning¶
- [ ] Identify indications for ordering an echocardiogram in children
- [ ] Interpret basic echocardiographic findings on reports (normal vs abnormal)
- [ ] Understand Z-scores and why they matter more than absolute measurements
- [ ] Recognize findings that require urgent cardiology consultation
Management Decisions¶
- [ ] Determine when a patient needs an echo vs clinical observation
- [ ] Know when to call cardiology urgently based on echo findings
- [ ] Understand typical follow-up intervals for common findings
Communication & Counseling¶
- [ ] Explain to families what an echo shows and what it doesn't
- [ ] Discuss significance of "small hole" or "leaky valve" findings
- [ ] Address family concerns about findings and their implications
Systems-Based Practice¶
- [ ] Order appropriate type of echo (TTE, stress, TEE)
- [ ] Coordinate follow-up based on findings
Key Guidelines¶
2024 ASE Guidelines for Comprehensive Pediatric TTE J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2024;37:119-170
When to Order an Echocardiogram¶
Definite Indications¶
| Finding | Why Echo Needed |
|---|---|
| Murmur + symptoms | Rule out structural disease |
| Abnormal pulses | Coarctation, aortic stenosis |
| Cyanosis | CHD evaluation |
| Failed CCHD screen | Confirm/exclude CHD |
| Syncope + exertion | HCM, coronary anomalies |
| Known CHD follow-up | Monitor lesion progression |
| Kawasaki disease | Coronary artery assessment |
| Chest pain + abnormal ECG | Myocarditis, cardiomyopathy |
| Family history sudden death | Screen for HCM, ARVC |
Usually NOT Needed¶
| Finding | Why Echo Usually Unnecessary |
|---|---|
| Innocent murmur (classic features) | Clinical diagnosis sufficient |
| Chest pain, normal exam/ECG | Rarely cardiac in children |
| Isolated palpitations, normal ECG | Start with Holter |
| Asymptomatic athlete clearance | ECG more appropriate screen |
Understanding the Echo Report¶
Structure Assessment¶
What they measure: - Chamber sizes (left/right atrium and ventricle) - Wall thickness - Valve structure
What Z-scores mean: - Z-score = how many standard deviations from normal for body size - Normal: -2 to +2 - Borderline: 2.0 to 2.5 - Abnormal: >2.5 or <-2.5
Pearl: Z-scores matter more than absolute numbers
A 4-year-old and 14-year-old cannot have the same "normal" LV size. Always look at Z-scores.
Function Assessment¶
| Parameter | Normal | Concerning |
|---|---|---|
| LV Ejection Fraction (EF) | 55-70% | <50% |
| LV Shortening Fraction (SF) | 28-40% | <25% |
| RV Function (TAPSE) | Age-dependent | <2 SD for age |
Valve Assessment¶
Regurgitation grading: - Trivial/trace: Usually physiologic, no concern - Mild: Usually tolerated, monitor - Moderate: May need intervention eventually - Severe: Usually requires treatment
Stenosis (gradients): - Mild: Peak gradient <25 mmHg - Moderate: 25-50 mmHg - Severe: >50 mmHg (valvar AS) or >40 mmHg (CoA)
Common Echo Findings Explained¶
"Small VSD"¶
- Tiny muscular VSDs are common in newborns
- Most close spontaneously (especially <3mm)
- Usually no treatment, no restrictions
- Tell families: "A tiny hole that will likely close on its own"
"Trivial TR/MR/PR"¶
- Trace regurgitation is NORMAL
- Found in most normal hearts
- No clinical significance
- Tell families: "Normal finding, not a problem"
"Mildly dilated LV"¶
- Z-score 2.0-2.5
- May be athletic heart, volume loading, or early cardiomyopathy
- Needs clinical correlation
- Follow-up: Repeat echo in 3-6 months if unexplained
"Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO)"¶
- Present in ~25% of population
- Usually incidental finding
- No treatment, no restrictions
- Tell families: "Normal variant, everyone has this before birth"
When to Call Cardiology Urgently¶
Call Cardiology Immediately
- EF <40% or significant decline from prior
- Large pericardial effusion with tamponade physiology
- Severe valve stenosis (especially aortic)
- Coronary artery abnormality (aneurysm, anomalous origin)
- New severe ventricular dysfunction
- Evidence of endocarditis
Z-Score Quick Reference¶
Where to Look Up Z-Scores¶
- parameterz.com - Multiple calculators
- zscore.chboston.org - Boston Children's calculator
Which System for What¶
| Structure | Use This System |
|---|---|
| Coronary arteries | PHN (Pediatric Heart Network) |
| Aortic root | Multiple valid options |
| LV dimensions | Boston, Detroit |
Board Pearls¶
Pearl: Z-scores >2.5 are significant
This is roughly 2 standard deviations above mean - only ~1% of normal population
Pearl: Kawasaki coronary assessment requires PHN Z-scores
Absolute measurements not valid - must calculate Z-score for body size
Pearl: EF <55% in a child is abnormal
Unlike adults, children should have robust LV function
Self-Assessment¶
Q1: A 4-week-old has a grade 2/6 murmur at LUSB. Echo shows small restrictive muscular VSD with left-to-right shunt, normal LV size and function. What do you tell the parents?
Answer
**Answer**: Reassure that this is a small hole between the heart chambers that will likely close on its own. No restrictions, no treatment needed. Follow-up echo in 6-12 months. **Rationale**: Small muscular VSDs are common, usually close spontaneously, and rarely cause problems. The normal LV size confirms this is hemodynamically insignificant.Q2: An 8-year-old with Kawasaki disease (day 10) has echo showing RCA diameter 3.5mm. BSA 0.9 m2. Is this concerning?
Answer
**Answer**: Need to calculate Z-score using PHN equations. For this BSA, normal RCA would be ~2mm. A Z-score >2.5 indicates coronary artery aneurysm requiring intensified treatment. **Rationale**: Absolute coronary measurements are meaningless without body size context. PHN Z-scores are the standard for Kawasaki coronary assessment.Related Topics¶
- Kawasaki Disease - Coronary Z-scores
- Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy - Wall thickness
- Innocent Murmurs - When echo NOT needed
- Heart Failure - Function assessment
- CCHD Screening - Failed screen workup
References¶
- ASE Guidelines. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2024;37:119-170
- Lopez L, et al. JASE. 2010;23:465-495 (Z-score standards)